Case of Kokkinakis v. Greece (3/1992/348/421)

Case of Kokkinakis v. Greece (3/1992/348/421) by European Court of Human Rights. Download PDF EPUB FB2

Kokkinakis v. Greece*, The European Court of Human Rights, sitting, in accordance with Article 43 The circumstances of the case 6. Mr Minos Kokkinakis, a retired businessman of Greek nationality, was born into an Orthodox family at Sitia (Crete) in the house and began to read from a book File Size: KB.

The Court is one of the most significant institutions confronting the interactions among states, religious groups, minorities, and dissenters. In the 25 years since its first Case of Kokkinakis v.

Greece book case, Kokkinakis v. Greece, the Court has inserted itself squarely into the international human rights debate regarding the freedom of religion or belief. The authors demonstrate the positive contributions and the significant flaws of the Court's jurisprudence Released Case of Kokkinakis v.

Greece book Janu   The Court is one of the most significant institutions confronting the interactions among states, religious groups, minorities, and dissenters. In the 25 years since its first religion case, Kokkinakis v. Greece, the Court has inserted itself squarely into the international human rights Case of Kokkinakis v.

Greece book regarding the freedom of religion or belief. The authors demonstrate the positive contributions and the significant flaws of the Court's jurisprudence Author: Agnès Callamard. Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. May Kokkinakis v. Greece - / Judgment Article 9. Article Freedom of religion.

Manifest religion or belief. Conviction of a Jehovah's Witness for proselytism: violation [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series A or Reports of Judgments and. Kokkinakis upholds freedom of religion as an essential foundation of a democratic society.

Nevertheless a balance must be struck to ensure that everyone’s beliefs are respected. The jurisprudence in Kokkinakis is frequently cited by the Court in Art. 9 cases. Furthermore, in the cases Case of Kokkinakis v. Greece book Kokkinakis v. Greece and Manoussakis and Others v.

Greece — in which the facts had, however, been different from those of the instant case — the Court had had to rule under Article 9 of the Convention on the application of the relevant Greek legislation to.

The HUDOC database provides access to the case-law of the Court (Grand Chamber, Chamber and Committee judgments and decisions, communicated cases, advisory opinions and legal summaries from the Case-Law Information Note), the European Commission of Human Rights (decisions and reports) and the Committee of Ministers (resolutions)Missing: Greece.

"Kokkinakis v Greece, Judgment, Merits and Just Satisfaction, App No /88, A/A, [] E () 17 EHRRIHRL (ECHR ), 25th MayEuropean Court of Human Rights [ECHR]" published on by Oxford University Press.

KOKKINAKIS v GREECE In a judgment delivered at Strasbourg on 25 May in the Kokkinakis case the European Court of Human Rights held by 6 votes to 3 that there had been a violation of Article 9 (right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion) of the Case of Kokkinakis v.

Greece book Convention on Human Rights. It. The first decision, issued inwas the case of Kokkinakis ; the second, issued inwas the case of Manoussakis and Others —See The Watchtower, September 1,pages ; Awake!, Mapages Greece – conviction of air force officers for proselytism (section 4 of Law no.

Case of Kokkinakis v. Greece book I. ARTICLE 7 OF THE CONVENTION Position in Greek law had not become any less clear since Court’s decision in Kokkinakis v. Greece judgment that requirements of certainty and foreseeability under. Kokkinakis v.

Greece, 25 May§ 31, Series A no. A, and. Buscarini and - Others v. San Marino [GC], no. /94, § 34, ECHR I). In a democratic society, in which several religions or branches of the CASE-LAW ON FREEDOM OF RELIGION File Size: KB.

The Kokkinakis case is a landmark judgment and a pilot case of the European Court of Human Rights. Init was the first religious freedom case with which the European Court was confronted.

Its decision endorsing the fundamental right to share one’s beliefs with others concerned not only Greece but all the 47 member states of the Council. Kokkinakis v Greece, 17 EHRR Add to My Bookmarks Export citation. Type Article Author(s) 7/88Before the European Court of Human Rights25 May (The President, Judge Ryssdal; Judges Bernhardt, Pettiti, De Meyer, Valticos, Martens, Foighel, Loizou, Lopes Rocha) May.

Most cases are concerned with the latter qualified right. In dealing with such cases, Strasbourg organs invariably begin by stressing the importance of the right, citing the leading case, Kokkinakis v Greece,which elucidated how ‘Freedom of thought, conscience and religion is one of the foundations of a “democratic society” within the.

These questions are addressed through empirical research conducted on the indirect effects of ECtHR religion-related case law, including Kokkinakis, at the grassroots level in Greece.

Discover the Author: Effie Fokas.The Constitutional Restrictions of Religious Freedom and the Crime of Proselytization (On the Occasion of the Judgment of Kokkinakis v. Greece Issued by the European Court of Human Rights 15 () (in Greek).

O.L. /36 and O.L. /38, in conjunction with art. PL, were also utilized for the initiation of criminal prosecutions against Cited by: 2. The landmark case of Kokkinakis v.

Greece in marked the genesis of a serious and highly consequential engagement with religion. This case dealt with the compatibility of certain sanctions for proselytism with Articles 7 and 9 of the ECHR. The ruling of six-to-three votes that a Jehovah’s Witness man’s freedom to manifest his religion.

This banner text can have markup. web; books; video; audio; software; images; Toggle navigation. This case is a mixture of freedom of religion and belief, and freedom of expression, it is a clear indication that freedom of expression is allowed to express oneself, as long as the individual is not obliged, implied or expressly to listen, argue and engaged.

ECtHR, Kokkinakis v. Greece, App. /88 () ECtHR, Grigoriades v. "Another case involved a Witness in Greece named Minos Kokkinakis. Over a period of 48 years, he was arrested more than 60 times for “proselytism.” On 18 occasions, he.

kokkinakis_greeceECHR References: Independent Jun, Times Jun, /88, [] 17 EHRR[] ECHR 20 Links: Bailii, Bailii Ratio: The defendant was convicted for proselytism contrary to Greek law. He claimed a breach of Article 9. Held: To say that Jehovah’s Witness were proselytising criminally was excessive.

Such as in the case of Kokkinakis v Greece the complainant went to the ECHR arguing that his Rights in particular Article 9 had been infringed. But when the matter came before the ECHR the Greek Government could not produce a reason(s) from the list of restrictions in Article 9 to justify his arrest.

Early life. A shopkeeper by trade, Kokkinakis originally was a Greek Orthodox Christian but became a Jehovah's Witness in Imprisonment. In he was the first Witness in Greece to be arrested for violating the law against proselytism which the government of dictator Ioannis Metaxas had just enacted under pressure from the Greek Orthodox Church.

As the Court pointed out in its judgment in the case of Kokkinakis v. Greece of 25 May (Series A no. A, p. 17, para. 31), freedom of thought, conscience and. Onthe European Court decided that the Greek government had violated the religious freedom of the then year-old Minos Kokkinakis and awarded him damages in.

the United Kingdom (no. 1);Kokkinakis v. Greece;Grigoriades v. Greece. In the case of Larissis and Others v. Greece[fn2], The European Court of Human Rights, sitting, in accordance with Article of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental.

The European Court of Human Rights (“the Court”) did not find a violation of Article 9 until the case of Kokkinakis v. Greece which was decided only seventeen years ago, in Even after that seminal decision, religious freedom cases were still relatively rare for several years; inthere had been fewer than thirty Court cases on Cited by: 8.

The landmark judgement, known as Kokkinakis v Greece, was frequently cited in similar cases of proselytism in Greece, leading to acquittals not just of Jehovah's Witnesses but of Pentecostal.

A short video on the Supervision of the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Violations CASE OF TSARTSIDZE AND OTHERS v.

GEORGIA CASE OF MAGYARORSZÁGI EVANGÉLIUMI TESTVÉRKÖZÖSSÉG V. HUNGARY CASE OF MOZER v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA C. The Kokkinakis v. Greece () case was the first in which the Court found a violation of religious freedom; this case was a watershed, opening the floodgates on what would evolve to be an incredibly powerful role played by the ECtHR in the domain of religious freedom across the 47 member states of the Council of Europe.

Today nearly 20% of. Get this from a library. Affaire Kokkinakis c. Grèce: arrêt du 25 mai = Case of Kokkinakis v. Greece: judgement of 25 May Affaire Papamichalopoulos et autres c. Grèce: arrêt du 24 juin = Case of Papamichalopoulos and others v. Greece: judgement of 24 June [Minos Kokkinakis; Petros Papamichalopoulos; European Court of Human Rights.].

He is most notable for his repeated clashes with Greece's ban on proselytism. For starters, freedom of religion: "Another case involved a Witness in Greece named Minos Kokkinakis.

Over a period of 48 years, he was arrested more than 60 times for “proselytism.” On 18 occasions, he faced prosecution in court. Created Date: 9/2/ AM.

Convention rights cases. STUDY. PLAY. McCann and others v UK. Right to life (IRA members) (proportionality) Kokkinakis v Greece. Freedom of religion (atheism) Arrowsmith v UK.

Really Important Supreme Court Cases. OTHER SETS BY THIS CREATOR. 10 terms. Admissibility to ECtHR. 6 terms. Directors' Duties Cases. Efstratiou v. Greece The facts and questions of this case are similar to Valsamis v.

Greece. Finally inJehovah's Witnesses were no longer suspended from school for refusing to participate in ceremonies or activities that would have violated their conscience. (29 May ), Strasbourg 56/// (Eur. H.R.) Georgiadis v. Greece. Get this from a library.

The European Court of Human Rights and the freedom of religion or belief: the 25 years since Kokkinakis. [Jeroen Temperman; T Jeremy Gunn; Malcolm D Evans;] -- As the tensions involving religion and society increase, the European Court of Human Rights and the Freedom of Religion or Belief is the first systematic analysis of the first twenty-five years of.

Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, (/91) [] ECHR 41 (26 September ) Facts: the applicants are 4 Greek Jehovah's Witnesses who live in Crete and who had rented rooms to serve as a temple for the Greek Constitution, proselytism is forbidden, as well as setting up churches without written authorization from the local authority, which they claimed the authorities had made.

The focus of the European Court of Human Rights ("the Court") with regard to religion is summarized in a passage that it used in the case of Kokkinakis v.

Greece and has repeated in every major religious freedom case since: [F]reedom of thought, conscience and religion is one of the foundations of a "democratic society". Greece has a special place in the religion-related jurisprudence of the ECtHR: the Kokkinakis v.

Greece case () was the first in which a violation of religious freedom (Art.9) was found, and nearly 20% of all such violations found amongst 47 states are against the state of Greece. Kokkinakis v. Greece, a case involving a Jehovah’s Witness pdf had been repeatedly arrested and jailed for violating Greece’s ∗ Associate Professor or Law, Valparaiso University School of Law.

B.A., The Johns Hopkins University; M.A., The Johns Hopkins University; J.D., University of Virginia School of.Learn vocabulary religion 9 freedom with free interactive flashcards.

Choose from different sets of vocabulary religion 9 freedom flashcards on Quizlet.